Member-only story

Obshchestvennost and Civic Agency in Late Imperial and Soviet Russia: A Historical Perspective

Edwin Cox

·18.2k Followers· Follow

Published in Obshchestvennost And Civic Agency In Late Imperial And Soviet Russia: Interface Between State And Society

6 min read

135 View Claps

25 Respond

Save

Listen

The concept of obshchestvennost, often translated as "public sphere" or "civil society", has played a significant role in Russian history and political thought. In the late imperial period (1861-1917),obshchestvennost emerged as a vibrant and diverse arena for public debate and activism, fostering a sense of civic agency among the educated elite and beyond. However, the Soviet period (1917-1991) witnessed a profound transformation in the nature and scope of obshchestvennost, as the state sought to establish a monopoly on public discourse and curtail independent forms of civic engagement.

This article explores the historical evolution of obshchestvennost and civic agency in Russia, tracing its origins in the late imperial period and examining its transformation under Soviet rule. By examining key moments and figures in Russian history, we will gain a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between the state, society, and individual citizens in shaping the contours of public life.

The late imperial period witnessed a remarkable expansion of public life in Russia, marked by the growth of print media, the emergence of voluntary associations, and the emergence of a vocal intelligentsia. These developments fostered a sense of common identity and a desire for greater participation in public affairs among the educated elite.

Obshchestvennost’ and Civic Agency in Late Imperial and Soviet Russia: Interface between State and Society

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	785 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Print length	:	247 pages

One of the key manifestations of obshchestvennost in this period was the zemstvo movement. Established in 1864 as a system of local self-government, the zemstvos provided a platform for the local elite to address issues of public concern, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. The zemstvos also became a training ground for future political leaders, many of whom would go on to play prominent roles in the Duma (the Russian parliament) after the 1905 Revolution.

Another important aspect of obshchestvennost was the rise of voluntary associations. These included philanthropic societies, educational organizations, and professional groups that sought to address a wide range of social and cultural issues. The proliferation of voluntary associations provided opportunities for individuals to engage in public life and make a meaningful contribution to society.

The emergence of obshchestvennost in late imperial Russia was also fueled by the growth of a vocal intelligentsia. Composed of intellectuals, writers, and academics, the intelligentsia played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and advocating for social and political reforms. Through their writings, speeches, and activism, the intelligentsia helped to cultivate a sense of civic responsibility and a desire for change among the broader public.

The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 brought about a fundamental shift in the nature and scope of obshchestvennost. The new Soviet regime sought to establish a monopoly on public discourse and suppress independent forms of civic engagement. This led to the closure of voluntary associations, the censorship of the press, and the persecution of dissidents.

Under Soviet rule, obshchestvennost was largely confined to state-controlled organizations, such as trade unions, youth groups, and women's organizations. These organizations served as transmission belts for the party's policies, and their activities were closely monitored by the state. Individuals who sought to engage in independent civic activities faced the threat of repression.

Despite the constraints imposed by the Soviet regime, forms of civic agency persisted in various forms. One example was the emergence of the samizdat movement in the 1960s and 1970s. Samizdat, meaning "self-publishing", allowed dissidents to circulate underground literature and ideas, creating a space for independent thought and expression.

Another example was the rise of environmental activism in the 1970s and 1980s. The Soviet government's neglect of environmental issues led to widespread pollution and public health concerns. In response, citizens organized protests, wrote letters to officials, and established unofficial environmental groups to raise awareness and demand action.

The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 brought about a revival of obshchestvennost and a renewed emphasis on civic agency. The new Russian Constitution guaranteed freedom of speech, assembly, and association, creating a more open environment for public debate and activism.

The post-Soviet period has witnessed the emergence of a diverse range of non-governmental organizations (NGOs),civic groups, and social movements. These organizations have played a vital role in addressing social, economic, and environmental issues, and in advocating for greater transparency and accountability from the government.

Despite the revival of obshchestvennost in post-Soviet Russia, challenges remain. The government has sought to tighten control over NGOs and limit their activities, and some critics have accused the state of undermining civic agency by creating a climate of fear and self-censorship.

The concept of obshchestvennost and civic agency has a long and complex history in Russia. In the late imperial period, obshchestvennost emerged as a vibrant and diverse arena for public debate and activism, fostering a sense of civic responsibility among the educated elite and beyond. However, the Soviet period witnessed a profound transformation in the nature and scope of obshchestvennost, as the state sought to establish a monopoly on public discourse and curtail independent forms of civic engagement.

The post-Soviet period has brought about a revival of obshchestvennost and a renewed emphasis on civic agency. However, challenges remain, and the relationship between the state, society, and individual citizens continues to shape the contours of public life in Russia.

By understanding the historical evolution of obshchestvennost and civic agency in Russia, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities of Russian society and the ongoing struggle for a more open and just society.

References

Fitzpatrick, Sheila. ""Obshchestvennost": The Russian Public Sphere."" Slavic Review 41.2 (1982): 239-254.
Millar, James R. "The Soviet Union in the Sixties: Obshchestvennost and a New Strategy."" Soviet Studies 29.4 (1978): 597-620.
Stites, Richard. "The Russian Intelligentsia and Russian Civil Society in the First Half of the 19th Century."" Slavic Review 43.4 (1984): 692-714.
Yurchak, Alexei. "The Public Sphere in Postsocialist Russia."" Public Culture 12.1 (2000): 117-146.

Obshchestvennost’ and Civic Agency in Late Imperial and Soviet Russia: Interface between State and Society

5 out of 5